Should Bruce Power ship 16,000 tonnes of waste through Ontario?

Author: 
Ryan Elias
Source: 
The Tyee
Date published: 
Wed, 2010-08-04

On September 29th, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission will hold a public hearing on a Bruce Power plan to ship 16,000 tonnes of radioactive waste through Ontario to Sweden to be melted down.

Bruce Power operates the Bruce Nuclear Generating Station, one of the largest nuclear power plants in the world, on the shore of Lake Huron in southern Ontario.

The steam generators from a section of that plant, which processed radioactive water for about 20 years before being decommissioned, are considered low-grade radioactive waste. They were originally slated for disposal in long-term storage on-site, but in April the company decided to ship them to Sweden first to separate into their component parts.

Additional excerpt:

In a press release, the Sierra Club of Canada claimed credit for the hearing, but its executive director, John Bennett, said to the Tyee that it doesn't mean much on its own. He said he wants a full environmental assessment performed on the proposal.

"The Sierra Club feels that this is a major deviation from the original environmental assessment. That would call for a revisiting of the environmental assessment, not just a rubber-stamping of the change," he said.

Comments

Bruce Power Hearing?

So, what are we asking here?

I agree that we shouldn't be complacent about the potential dangers of nuclear waste transport, but I am unclear on the most useful position to take regarding this matter.

In order to effect change in this matter it is necessary to participate in the hearing on Sept 29th, via letter or in person or both. Written confirmation of this "intervention" must be presented by Sept 13th to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC.)

So are we asking them to conduct an additional environmental assessment specifically for the transport of the low grade nuclear waste? Or are we asking them not to transport the waste at all?

While I am concerned about nuclear power and all of the related safety issues, I am by no means an expert and I'd love some clarification or feedback about what the "best-case scenario" here would be! Thanks!

Not just Ontario

While the shipments are to originate in Ontario, they are slated to travel through the St. Lawrence Seaway en route to Sweden. This will take them through Quebec and into coastal waters off Newfoundland & Labrador. The generator recycling plan is to separate reusable, uncontaminated steel from the radioactive component. Then, as legally mandated, the more concentrated radioactive component is to be shipped back to Canada for permanent storage. While we've got plenty of reason to be concerned about the outgoing shipments, we have even more reason to be concerned about the more highly radioactive return shipments. One of the most disturbing aspects of this story is Bruce Power's repeated public statements that these shipments represent "no risk." This type of complacency is exactly what was behind the BP Gulf oil spill. When companies (or individuals, for that matter) decide that an activity is entirely risk-free, that is when they become careless.

Connect with us ...


            

The Bennett Blog

Read the BLOG of
Sierra Club Canada's
Executive Director
John Bennett
 
Follow John on TWITTER

Sign Up and Get Involved

Enter your email address to receive important news and action alerts!