Remembrance for the Future: Chernobyl
By Emilie Moorhouse
May 17, 2006
It is a shame that Premier McGuinty’s recent comments give
equal weight to the “draw-backs” of nuclear power and
the unsightliness of wind turbines. This association is no different
than equating the effects of full-blown AIDS with the sniffles –
the two are simply not comparable. It is also irresponsible to plan
the future of our energy supply mix with such disregard for the
true dangers and risks associated with nuclear power.
It has been twenty years since the Chernobyl accident certainly
drove home the horrendous consequences we risk by investing in nuclear
power. Chernobyl is not only in the past: it is in our present and
in our future. Twenty years after the accident, cancer rates are
increasing, and will continue to do so. Increases in birth defects
and genetic mutations have been observed. The effects of Chernobyl
are increasing and scientists predict the worst effects are still
An independent report commissioned by members of the European Parliament
looked at global impacts of the Chernobyl disaster, and estimated
that up to 60,000 people will die as a result of the fallout. Many
deaths will be in Western Europe, where more than half of the fallout
occurred. Approximately 40% of Europe’s surface was contaminated.
Twenty years after the accident the Native Samis in Northern Sweden
have to buy special animal feed for the reindeer to prevent them
from absorbing too much radiation through feeding on wild lichen.
Austria, Wales, Northern Italy, and Southern Germany also received
The opening ceremony of the Conference in Kiev featured a photo
exhibit of the “dead zone,” the commonly used name for
the 30-kilometre exclusion zone surrounding the reactor. As pictures
of abandoned classrooms, with books still open, lying on the neatly
arranged desks, floated by on the screen I could not help but wonder
whether this would be a unique event in the history of the world
which would serve as a reminder of what should never happen again,
or if Chernobyl will be downplayed and forgotten, destined to be
repeated elsewhere and the images on the screen only premonitions
of future accidents.
It is extremely unpleasant to begin to realize just how vulnerable
the world is to a single nuclear accident, and to imagine the horrors
of radiation on human health. But we cannot afford to forget this.
This is why it is so irresponsible for a government that is considering
investing in nuclear energy to dismiss the risks of an accident.
The passengers on the Titanic were assured its technology made it
unsinkable, just like today we are assured that technological progress
means CANDU reactors cannot experience meltdown. One month prior
to the Chernobyl explosion, the International Atomic Energy Agency
declared the Chernobyl RBMK reactors the safest in the world. We
cannot risk another Chernobyl, and the only way to guarantee averting
another accident is to phase-out nuclear power.
Studies have shown we can phase it out and still power Ontario.
The sooner this happens, the more diminished the risk and the less
radioactive waste will be left to future generations. But even if
all countries declare a phase-out today, we will still have to be
sure to tell our grandchildren, to tell their grandchildren, to
tell their grandchildren, to also tell their grandchildren, for
many generations to come, how to manage the highly radioactive waste,
some of which has a half-life of 24,000 years.
Emilie Moorhouse is an Atmosphere and Energy
campaigner with the Sierra Club of Canada.
Main Publications page
People, Trade and the Environment
How to be an Activist
Also see our Postings page